theatreofsin: A huge wolf with a bloody muzzle lowering above a cityscape. (Fenris is Risen (and so am I))
[personal profile] theatreofsin
Let's glance at a couple of controlling images.

In one, a wolf attacks a man who screams and tries to beat him back. The man is overcome and falls bleeding into submission as the wolf tears at his flesh. Then, in a moment, the wolf is seized by the man's own terror and pain and, horrified, runs from the crime and leaves him.

In the other, a wolf attacks a man who takes a deep breath and opens himself to the teeth and the violence. The man is overcome and falls bleeding into submission as the wolf tears at his flesh. Then, in a moment, the wolf is seized by the man's own acceptance and relents, licking the wounds clean.

It works only, of course, if the wolf and the man are in some way allied; if the wolf is not motivated by malice, if the man can accept the part of him which can be hurt and the part of the wolf which needs to hurt. And it's best to remember that wolves and men are not mutually exclusive. The scene could still play if they were both animal, tearing into each other, reacting with fear or acceptance, breaking apart or licking each other clean.

Date: 2010-11-12 09:47 pm (UTC)
tangyabominy: (i will never say)
From: [personal profile] tangyabominy
Or neither, if you're going to rely on the wounder to the fullest.

Wolves need to hurt. Men are capable of being hurt. To accept that completely might mean that the wolf won't back off, or start licking your wounds. It might mean it goes right on being a wolf and keeps eating.

Because that is the role of the wolf, to eat. That is the role of the man, to be eaten.

For there to be a bond in that, the wolf still also needs to not be entirely motivated by malice. It needs to accept that it's being honoured, and take the gift joyfully. The countless things that destroy us every day don't necessarily form deep bonds in the destruction, because they destroy without thinking. Some thought is required, for a bond to be forged.

But there also doesn't have to be compromise. One party can surrender entirely, and be consumed. That is a bond, too.

Date: 2010-11-16 03:11 am (UTC)
tangyabominy: (i will never say)
From: [personal profile] tangyabominy
I could stand to live in that society. I know someone who might love to live in it.

Ultimate is an interesting word, that way.

And the second paragraph, the italicised part, strikes me again to the point where I have trouble putting words to any of it. I suppose there are many points of the spectrum of that mingling: whether it's a monster deciding to abate and lick your wounds, or a monster who takes and takes until all is lost but is still there with you, is still the psychopomp guiding you to safe ground beyond the limits of what safety can provide. I'm talking more about the second, and you the first, I think, but they both fall under that (very powerful) descriptor you've given there.

Profile

theatreofsin: Neon lights reading SIN. (Default)
theatreofsin

January 2025

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 21st, 2025 05:41 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios